blades
Asset GM - 3 player points, 3 million
Posts: 249
|
Post by blades on Jan 22, 2009 16:25:31 GMT -5
If they are based "ENTIRELY" on NHL careers, what are we gonna do in a few months? When we have players that haven't played NHL games. And if that were true....wouldn't Eric Lindros have had horrible DU? (unless you put a crap load of player points into him). My "should go away" comment meant that this issue has been up for awhile, less than 50% of the league seems to not really have an issue with it, so I take that as this being an issue that dosen't effect enough people to continue talking about it. I did vote indifferent, so I don't really care either way, if enough people want re-rates then lets do it! If not enough people care, then lets move on on forget about it. It hasn't even been two weeks since the original post, but how much longer do you want to wait? Don't get me wrong, opinions do matter, I agree......but how long are we going to go on with this. If you wanted to, maybe you could try to email to the ones that haven't voted and get them on board with the re-rates?! We do get "rewards" one of which being NHL re-rates. Can't you just use one of them to correct the error?
Please know that I am not trying to argue with you!
I think there were more reasons than just player ratings that made the other league fold, this was just the nail in the coffin.
One question for ya.....think you have enough players??!! You could almost suit-up to teams! lol
|
|
|
Post by flyers on Jan 23, 2009 10:06:08 GMT -5
Hah, I have ALMOST enough hah. Im actually waiting for 3 more guys I signed in the offseason to be added! Give me a year and Ill take on some pro teams with my farm guys in exhibition games... I get a 3 goal head start though Oh, and sorry I should have said 'based entirely on NHL careers when created' because Lindros was pre-existing, his attributes were likely based on 1996 (?) figures, whereas NEW players are based on their careers to date... that might make more sense. If he was created today Im sure he'd be very good, but have a 38 DU or something... (for the record I think Ive used 7 player pts on his DU).
|
|
toronto
Getting there - 2 Player points, 100k
Posts: 62
|
Post by toronto on Jan 23, 2009 16:04:34 GMT -5
I got a question here for the guys looking to have the prospects recreated.
Which prospects exaclty is there a problem with and what ratings in particular are the culprits?
Maybe we can do some minor modifications to the 'problem' guys and be done with it?
Or are they all wrong?
Personally, I think Michalek created fairly accurately...or atleast accurately enough that i'm fine with it. Milan Michalek LW L OK 67 68 77 74 64 67 66 70 69 69 70 27 25 73
I'd like to hear as many peoples opinion as possible on this...even comment on eachothers created prospects.
Thanks.
|
|
Nords GM
Asset GM - 3 player points, 3 million
Posts: 202
|
Post by Nords GM on Jan 23, 2009 18:32:14 GMT -5
K I have a suggestion.
We start a new thread, in this thread each person that has a problem with their created player(s) will post them there along with an agrument. We have a committee assembled to deal with this kind of stuff. There we can decide if the player goes up/down. This way the guys that reply get there agruments heard and those that don't.....enough said.
|
|